Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
SandyGeorgia (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 92:
*The world and Wikipedia are lesser places without her. Peace to her family and friends. [[User:Jip Orlando|Jip Orlando]] ([[User talk:Jip Orlando|talk]]) 14:26, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
*The timing of this... wow, very sad and unfortunate. Just incredibly sad. [[User:Elliot321|Elliot321]] ([[User_talk:Elliot321|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Elliot321|contribs]]) 03:26, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
*[Content by [[User:WanderingWanda|WanderingWanda]] removed
**[[User:WanderingWanda|WanderingWanda]], given that one of the passing remedies of the case was an iBan between you and Flyer, I think in the circumstances it really is inappropriate to be making these comments. In the interest of keeping things calm, it would be best for you to revert yourself and commit to following the intention of the case which is that you do not comment anywhere on Wikipedia about Flyer. [[User:SilkTork|SilkTork]] ([[User talk:SilkTork|talk]]) 13:03, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
*** And in the same vein, we should remember a three-way iBan was passing; that is, it also applies to Halo commenting on <s>Flyer</s> other parties. [[User:SandyGeorgia|'''Sandy'''<span style="color: green;">Georgia</span>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 15:18, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Line 98:
****Yes. Indeed, it would be more helpful to all concerned if the Committee simply finished the case. I understand the sensitivities involved, but completing the case and putting the remedies in place which included "Parties to the case are reminded to avoid enflaming discussions with flippant or dismissive commentary, and to focus on content, rather than contributors" would be more respectful to Flyer, and potentially prevent problems down the line. [[User:SilkTork|SilkTork]] ([[User talk:SilkTork|talk]]) 16:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
***** On the one hand, I am beginning to agree with that (see my talk), but on the other hand, I think enough anger has already been directed at the arbs, in spite of their sincere attempt to show compassion here (see SMcCandlish's talk), and that they have been put in a lose-lose situation over a predicament that the community failed to address. So I am in the unclear camp on what they might do next, but do know that the thing needs to not continue to spread to veiled threats because one offered evidence in an arbcase. And usually, when one doesn't know what is best, doing nothing for the time being is best. [[User:SandyGeorgia|'''Sandy'''<span style="color: green;">Georgia</span>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 16:51, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
*****I'm not going to fight about the removal of my comment, especially since some people found parts of it insensitive, which wasn't my intent. But I will note that no remedy received the required votes, the case was dismissed, and therefore, by design, no party to the case is under any kind of interaction ban. [[User:WanderingWanda|WanderingWanda]] ([[User talk:WanderingWanda|talk]]) 20:34, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
|